Story Published:
Jun 28, 2004 at 11:49 PM PDT
Story Updated:
Aug 31, 2006 at 1:31 AM PDT
SEATTLE - Allegations of greed, excessive salon visits and
dubious paternity were the order of the day as relatives of the
late guitar legend Jimi Hendrix began fighting over his legacy in
court.
The messy situation concerns the last will of Jimi's father, Al
Hendrix, who inherited the rights to Jimi's music when the rock
star died in 1970. Jimi's brother, Leon, says he was unfairly
written out of the will at the behest of his stepsister, Janie
Hendrix, who runs the company in charge of the legacy, Experience
Hendrix LLC, with Jimi's cousin, Robert.
"This is about greed," Leon's lawyer, Robert Curran, told King
County Superior Court Judge Jeffrey Ramsdell during his opening
statement Monday. "Janie has lived a very, very good life. She
travels the world first-class; her family goes with her. They get
picked up in limos. They stay in first-class hotels."
She also gave herself low-interest loans, a bonus that exceeded
her salary and visited a Gene Juarez salon 110 times in a one-year
period with a corporate credit card, he said.
Meanwhile, other relatives who, under Al Hendrix's final will,
were supposed to receive money from Jimi Hendrix's posthumous
releases, royalties and merchandising struggle to make ends meet
while working as hardware store clerks or in other low-paying jobs,
he said.
The money "benefited so few, when there is enough to benefit so
many," Curran said.
The case is one of several that have entangled the Hendrix
estate in the last decade. Leon, 56, is suing to have Janie ousted
as the company's boss and to have his father's will revised to
include him. Al Hendrix died in 2002 at age 82.
Janie rolled her eyes and shot dismissive glances as lawyers for
Leon Hendrix and other family members recited a litany of allegedly
excessive spending. Her lawyer, John Wilson, told the judge that
some of it has been repaid and a special audit will determine how
much more she and Robert Hendrix should repay.
But Wilson stressed that what is at issue is Al Hendrix's will,
not the company's performance - and Al Hendrix did not want Leon or
Leon's children to have any involvement in the company or receive
any money from it.
A 1996 version of Al's will would have directed 24 percent of
the legacy to Leon, 38 percent to Janie and the balance to other
beneficiaries, but it was rewritten in 1997 to exclude Leon, whom
some in the family regarded as a freeloader and possibly not Al's
biological child. Leon's paternity is sealed in court records.
Leon's six children, now aged 13 to 30, were also excluded from
Al's final will.
Wilson insisted that Al Hendrix decided on his own to write Leon
out of the will, but Leon's lawyer said Hendrix was infirm in his
old age, could not comprehend even the simplest legal issues and
would sign any document a lawyer placed before him.
Janie Hendrix exerted undue influence and urged Al to turn the
lion's share of the legacy over to her, and he complied, Curran
suggested.
Curran also said the lawyers who prepared Al's will had a
conflict of interest, because they also represented Janie and
Experience Hendrix.
Jimi Hendrix had released just three albums before he died at
age 27, but he had an extensive catalog of unreleased tracks. For
about two decades after his death, his legacy was run by a
California attorney who sold many of the copyrights off to other
companies.
At Janie's urging, Al Hendrix sued the lawyer in the early '90s
to regain the rights he had sold; that case was settled, but left
the company in debt. According to Janie, Al did not want money paid
to the beneficiaries listed in his will until the debt was paid
off. That is expected to happen in 2010.
In the seven years Janie has headed Experience Hendrix, it has
brought in $45 million, compared to the $38 million it earned in
the preceding decades.